Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report
San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project: Spartina
Control Program
September 2003
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... S-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 The
Spartina Control Program.................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Purpose
and Need..................................................................................................... 1-5
1.3 Purpose
and Use of This EIS/R.............................................................................. 1-28
1.4 Document
Organization.......................................................................................... 1-31
2.0 PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Development
of Alternatives for Evaluation............................................................ 2-1
2.2 Description
of Alternatives...................................................................................... 2-2
2.3 Alternatives
and Treatment Methods Considered and Eliminated from Further Evaluation........................................................................ 2-24
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES......................................................................................... 3-0.1
3.1 Geomorphology
and Hydrology............................................................................ 3.1-1
3.2 Water
Quality........................................................................................................ 3.2-1
3.3 Biological
Resources.............................................................................................. 3.3-1
3.4 Air
Quality............................................................................................................. 3.4-1
3.5 Noise...................................................................................................................... 3.5-1
3.6 Human
Health and Safety...................................................................................... 3.6-1
3.7 Visual
Resources.................................................................................................... 3.7-1
3.8 Land
Use................................................................................................................ 3.8-1
3.9 Cultural
Resources................................................................................................. 3.9-1
3.10 Socioeconomics.................................................................................................... 3.10-1
3.11 Environmental Justice.......................................................................................... 3.11-1
3.12 Cumulative
Impacts............................................................................................. 3.12-1
4.0 EVALUATION OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES.......................................................... 4-1
4.1 Comparison
of Alternatives...................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 NEPA
Environmentally Preferred Alternative......................................................... 4-3
4.3 CEQA
Environmentally Superior Alternative.......................................................... 4-3
4.4 Unavoidable
Significant Adverse Impacts................................................................ 4-4
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE............................................................................. 5-1
5.1 Applicable
Federal Laws, Regulations, Executive Orders, and Approvals................................................................................................................. 5-1
5.2 Applicable
State Laws, Regulations, and Policies.................................................... 5-8
5.3 Regional
Plans and Policies..................................................................................... 5-12
5.4 Local
Laws, Regulations, and Permits.................................................................... 5-14
5.5 Agency
Jurisdiction and Project Approvals........................................................... 5-14
6.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT............................................................................................... 6-1
6.1 Public
Concerns........................................................................................................ 6-1
6.2 List
of Document Recipients.................................................................................... 6-6
7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS............................................................ 7-1
7.1 California Coastal Conservancy................................................................................ 7-1
7.2 US Fish and Wildlife Service..................................................................................... 7-1
7.3 Technical Consultants............................................................................................... 7-1
8.0 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................... 8-1
9.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1 Personal
Communications......................................................................................... 9-1
9.2 Bibliography............................................................................................................. 9-1
10.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT
EIS/R......................................... 10-1
10.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 10-1
10.2 Comments and Responses...................................................................................... 10.3
10.3 Staff-Initiated Text Changes and Errata.............................................................. 10-135
APPENDICES (Volume 2)
A. Notice of Intent
B. Notice of Preparation
C. CEQA Initial Study
D. NOP/NOI Public Comment Letters
E. Herbicide and Surfactant Information
F. Sensitive Species Table
G. Best Management Practices for the California Clapper Rail
H. List of Document Recipients
I. ISP First-Year Pilot and Demonstration Projects
J. USFWS Biological Opinion
K. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
FIGURES
1-1 Spartina Control Program
Region....................................................................................... 1-3
1-2 Components
of the San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project............................... 1-5
1-3 Cordgrass
Species............................................................................................................. 1-13
1-4 Distribution
of Non-native Cordgrass in San Francisco Estuary..................................... 1-19
1-5 Effects of Non-Native Cordgrass on the San Francisco Estuary...................................... 1-21
1-6 California
Shoreline with Estuaries North and South of San Francisco Bay................................................................................................................................... 1-28
1-7 Typical San Francisco Estuary
Habitats Invaded by Atlantic Smooth
Cordgrass ....................................................................................................................... 1-29
2-1 Examples
of Methods that May be Used to Control Non-native Cordgrass............................................................................................................................ 2-3
2-2 Examples of Options for
Combining Treatment Methods............................................... 2-20
2-3 Number of Minus tide Events in 2003 with Peak and Potential California Clapper Rail Nesting and Fledging Periods...................................................... 2-21
3.2-1 Locations and Mean Discharges for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in South San Francisco Bay................................................................ 3.2-2
3.3-1 California Clapper
Rail Presence/Absence Relative to Non-native Cordgrass......................................................................................................................... 3.3-9
3.3-2 Conceptual Model of Possible Exposure of Biological Organisms to Herbicide Mixtures........................................................................................................ 3.3-27
3.7-1 Changes in Views Associated with Herbicide Use.......................................................... 3.7-3
3.7-2 Changes in Views Associated with Herbicide Use
and Mechanical Mowing........................................................................................................................... 3.7-5
3.7-3 Changes in Views Associated with with Covering and Native Plant Recovery.......................................................................................................................... 3.7-7
TABLES
S-1 Alternatives Analyzed in this EIS/R.................................................................................. S-3
S-2 Comparison of Impacts of Project Alternatives................................................................. S-7
1-1 Net and Gross Area Invaded by Non-native Cordgrass Species (2000-2001)...................................................................................................................... 1-17
1-2 Net Area in Acreage of Non-native Cordgrass Species by Bay Subregion (2000-2001) .................................................................................................... 1-17
2-1 Summary of Proposed Treatment Methods..................................................................... 2-13
2-2 Glyphosate Herbicide Component Concentrations and Application Rates................................................................................................................................. 2-17
3-1 Baseline and Post-Project Conditions............................................................................. 3.0-2
3.1-1 Summary of Potential Hydrologic and Geomorphic Effects......................................... 3.1-14
3.1-2 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Hydrology and Geomorphology............................................................................................................. 3.1-16
3.2-1 Dissolved Concentrations of Trace Metals in Water Samples........................................ 3.2-5
3.2-2 Total Concentrations of Trace Metals in Water Samples............................................... 3.2-6
3.2-3 Ranges of Trace Pollutants in San Francisco Bay Sediments.......................................... 3.2-6
3.2-4 Beneficial Uses of Waters of the San Francisco Estuary................................................. 3.2-7
3.2-5 Water Quality Criteria for Selected Constituents............................................................ 3.2-8
3.2-6 Sediment Chemistry Screening Guidelines ................................................................... 3.2-11
3.2-7 Summary of Potential Water Quality Effects................................................................ 3.2-19
3.2-8 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Water Quality................................................... 3.2-20
3.3-1 Summary of Potential Biological Resources Effects...................................................... 3.3-51
3.3-2 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Biological Resources......................................... 3.3-68
3.4-1 State and National Standards for Selected Criteria Pollutants, and Measured Air Pollutant Concentrations in the San Francisco Bay Area................................................................................................................................. 3.4-2
3.4-2 Summary of Potential Air Quality Effects...................................................................... 3.4-8
3.4-3 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Air Quality....................................................... 3.4-10
3.5-1 Technical Terms for Noise.............................................................................................. 3.5-2
3.5-2 Representative Outdoor and Indoor Noise Levels.......................................................... 3.5-3
3.5-3 Summary of Potential Noise Effects............................................................................... 3.5-8
3.5-4 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Noise................................................................... 3.5-9
3.6-1 Summary of Potential Human Health and Safety Effects............................................... 3.6-9
3.6-2 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Human Health and Safety................................. 3.6-11
3.7-1 Summary of Potential Visual Resources Effects........................................................... 3.7-11
3.8-1 Summary of Potential Land Use Effects......................................................................... 3.8-5
3.9-1 Summary of Potential Cultural Resources Effects.......................................................... 3.9-7
3.9-2 Summary of Mitigation Measures for Cultural Resources.............................................. 3.9-8
3.10-1 Distribution of Jobs in San Francisco Bay Area Counties.......................................... 3.10-1
4-1 Description of Project Alternatives Considered in This EIS/R.......................................... 4-1
5.5-1 Agency Jurisdiction and Project Approvals..................................................................... 5-14