Draft Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report
San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project: Spartina
Control Program
April 2003
|
Table 3.3-2: Summary
of Mitigation Measures for Biological Resources |
||||||
|
Mitigation |
Manual |
Mechanical |
Pruning, Hand-mowing, and
Smothering |
Flooding |
Burning |
Herbicide |
|
BIO-1.1: Saltmeadow and English cordgrass. Minimize vehicle and foot access pathways. Restrict equipment working in marsh
to mats and geotextile fabric covers.
Stockpile non-viable excavated non-native cordgrass and excavated
sediment and remove from marsh.
Stabilize smothering geotextile mats. Cover non-target vegetation, or pre-treat non-target
vegetation with protective films. Use optimal combinations of treatment to
minimize repeat entry to marsh. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-1.2: Atlantic Smooth cordgrass. Minimize vehicle and foot access pathways. Restrict equipment in working in
marsh plains to mats and geotextile fabric covers. Stockpile non-viable excavated non-native cordgrass and
excavated sediment and remove from marsh. Cover non-target vegetation with fabric adjacent to areas
sprayed with herbicide, or pre-treat with protective films of silt-clay. Stabilize smothering geotextile mats. Use optimal combinations of treatment
to minimize repeat entry to marsh and re-treatment. Minimize herbicide spray dose requirements by
pre-treatments. Use removal
methods rather than helicopter applications of herbicide whenever feasible
and less environmentally damaging.
Use non-spray application techniques to reduce herbicide dose and minimize
non-target contact. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-1.3: Chilean cordgrass. Identical with Mitigation BIO-1.1. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
BIO-1.4: Submerged aquatic plant communities. Remove large deposits of mown cordgrass during the growing season; or install temporary water-permeable debris barriers around vulnerable pans. Avoid transporting tanks of spray solution near pans. |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-2: Special-status plant
species. Conduct
pre-project spring surveys for sensitive plants and instruct field crews to
avoid and protect sensitive populations. Require qualified, experienced on-site botanical
supervision if sensitive plants occur in the vicinity. If sensitive plant
populations occur near the high tide line, rake and remove large deposits of
mown cordgrass during the growing season. Refrain from burning in marshes supporting sensitive plant
species. Stabilize smothering
geotextile mats. Cover
non-target vegetation, or install spray-drift barriers. If accidental exposure to spray drift
occurs, thoroughly irrigate affected plants with silt-clay suspensions.
Refrain from rapid replanting of Pacific cordgrass until Atlantic smooth
corgrass pollen and see rain is minimal. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-3: Shorebirds and
waterfowl. For work
within 1,000 feet of mudflats, schedule eradication activities to avoid peak
fall and spring Pacific Flyway stopovers. Mobilize crews to project sites before mudflats emerge.
Use optimal combinations of treatment to minimize repeat entry. Avoid helicopter applications of
herbicide to mudflat colonies within 1,000 feet of major habitual roosting or
foraging sites. As a last
resort, haze shorebirds and waterfowl within 1000 feet of spray operations.
Remediate small volumes of spilled solutions on mudflats. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-4.1: Salt marsh harvest
mouse and tidal marsh shrew subspecies. Minimize vehicle and foot access pathways in potential
tidal marsh habitat. Restrict equipment working in marsh to areas with mats
and geotextile fabric covers.
Use optimal combinations of treatment to minimize repeat entry
re-treatment. Schedule work in
suitable habitat soon after natural mass-mortality events caused by extreme
high tides. Compensatory
measures for incidental take include restoration of optimal habitat within
large tidal marsh restoration projects. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-4.2: Resident San
Francisco Bay harbor seals. Minimize vehicle and foot access pathways in marsh within 1,000 feet
of seal haul-outs, and avoid approaching haul-outs within 2,000 feet, or any
distance that elicits vigilance behavior when pups are present. Consult with
marine mammal experts to determine seasonal variation in sensitivity to
disturbance. Restrict equipment
working in marsh to prescribed paths.
Use optimal combinations of treatment to minimize repeat entry to
marsh and re-treatment. Refrain from use of low-flying helicopters within
2,000 feet of seal haul-outs. Transport any pre-mixed solutions of herbicide
in double-lined containers.
Remediate spilled solutions on mudflats to the greatest extent
feasible. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-5.1: California clapper
rail. To minimize or
avoid indirect impacts of eradication operations on clapper rails, follow
"best management practices" in EIS/R Appendix G, as modified by the US Fish
and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion. These protocols are based on (1) current survey and map
data to determine distribution and abundance of rails in relation to project
sites, and local behavior of rails in occupied habitats; (2) training and
expert biological supervision of field crews to detect clapper rails and
identify habitat; (3) modification of timing and within-site location of
operations to minimize or avoid disturbances to clapper rails. In addition, the mitigation measures
generally used to minimize disturbances in MITIGATION BIO-1.2 and BIO-4.1
also apply. For
unavoidable significant impacts due to eradication of Atlantic smooth cordgrass
and hybrids which provide habitat currently occupied by clapper rails, proportional
compensatory mitigation is necessary.
Primary components of compensatory mitigation include: (1) large-scale, rapid restoration of
suitable tidal salt marsh habitat (including all essential habitat components
for colonization by clapper rails) in advance of large-scale habitat
destruction, and within the same
subregion as impacts, but at locations with low invasion pressure from
non-native cordgrasses; (2) significantly increasing reproductive success of
clapper rails within the same subregion as impacts, through management which
reduces predation from non-native red fox, and enhances flood refugia (cover
for rails during extreme high tides). |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-5.2: California black
rail. Adapt protocols
for minimization and avoidance of California clapper rails (Appendix G) for
work in infested marshes known to support populations of California black
rails (currently one: Southhampton Marsh, Benicia), emphasizing pre-project
surveys (call detection), minimization of marsh disturbance (MITIGATION
BIO-1.2), and avoidance of occupied habitat during the breeding season. |
Applicable |
Potentially |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-5.3: Tidal marsh song
sparrow subspecies and salt marsh common yellowthroats. Adapt protocols for minimization
and avoidance of California clapper rails (Appendix G) for work in infested
marshes known to support populations of Alameda song sparrows, San Pablo song
sparrows, Suisun song sparrow, and the salt marsh common yellowthroat,
emphasizing pre-project surveys, minimization of marsh disturbance (MITIGATION
BIO-1.2), and avoidance of occupied habitat during the breeding season. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-5.4: Western snowy
plovers and California least terns. Prior to levee access in areas where snowy plovers and
least terns may breed, levee routes should be surveyed for potential nests,
including nests in salt pond beds near levee roads. Dredging and excavation
of cordgrass should be conducted either after least terns have migrated out
of San Francisco Bay, or during middle to lower tidal stages that allow
navigation of barge and crane operations, while exposing the maximum extent
of cordgrass above standing tides. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-5.5: Birds of prey in tidal
marshes. Minimize use
of helicopters to apply herbicides over marshplains where raptors forage. |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-6.1: Chinook salmon and steelhead (anadromnous salmonids). Dredging of infested intertidal channels should be limited to: (1) tidal stages when target areas are emerged above water level, and (2) during seasons when winter- and spring-run Chinook salmon and steelhead migration times minimize their risk of exposure at project sites, particularly juveniles. Intakes for impoundments should be limited to tides above mean high water to minimize entrainment and trapping. Alternatively, fish screens could be installed on new tidegates used to impound and drown large cordgrass-infested marshes in former diked baylands. Herbicide methods should be minimized or avoided near channels and mudflats during migration periods of winter-run and spring-run Chinook salmon and steelhead. Minimize glyphosate/surfactant spray application requirements by pre-treating target cordgrass stands with mechanical methods that reduce cordgrass biomass and density, increase receptivity and coverage of spray, and increase mortality response to glyphosate. In case of herbicide/surfactant solution spill, remediate small volumes of spilled solutions on mudflats to the greatest extent feasible by suction of surface muds, using portable wet vacuum or pumping equipment. |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-6.2: Delta smelt and Sacramento splittail. For work in infested North Bay
marshes where delta smelt or Sacramento splittail may occur (currently one:
Southhampton Marsh, Benicia), eliminate impoundment techniques and minimize
spray drift near tidal creeks (MITIGATION BIO-1.1, 1.2). Restrict any intertidal excavation or
dredging in tidal creeks to tidal stages when target areas are emerged above
water level. |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-6.4: Shallow-water estuarine fish. Dredging of infested intertidal channels should be limited to tidal stages when target areas are emerged above water level. Water intakes for impoundments should have invert elevations limited to tides above mean high water to minimize entrainment and trapping. Alternatively, fish screens could be installed on new tidegates used to impound and drown large cordgrass-infested marshes in former diked baylands. Herbicide methods should be minimized near channels. Minimize glyphosate/surfactant spray application requirements by pre-treating target cordgrass stands with mechanical methods that reduce cordgrass biomass and density, increase receptivity and coverage of spray, and increase mortality response to glyphosate. In case of herbicide/surfactant solution spill, remediate small volumes of spilled solutions on mudflats to the greatest extent feasible by suction of surface muds, using portable wet vacuum or pumping equipment. |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Applicable |
|
BIO-8: Mosquito production
in tidal marshes. Monitor
access routes in marshes to detect formation of undrained depressions in tire
ruts or foot trails. Backfill
access-related shallow marsh depressions or incise narrow drainages so they
do not impound small, sheltered areas of standing water. Where impoundments are used, design
impoundments of sufficient size and depth to minimize mosquito breeding
habitat. |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Applicable |
Note: Due to summarization, there may be textual differences between the measures in this summary table and the text in the section. The actual mitigation measure is in the text.